|
Post by Brian on Jan 25, 2010 23:42:17 GMT -5
I'm rooting for the Saints because it is their first super bowl appearance ever. I know what its like to have a hometown team that has never been to the Super Bowl. GO Saints! (and Browns)
|
|
|
Post by strippitman on Jan 26, 2010 8:00:40 GMT -5
I really love the Saints! But I don't think they stand a chance against the dominating Colts. Too many offensive weapons and an extremely underrated defense.
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Jan 26, 2010 15:18:15 GMT -5
Too many offensive weapons and an extremely underrated defense. were you talking about the Siants or Colts. If one of those teams has too many offensive weapons, it is the Saints. They have at least 4 recievers who are major threats, their running game can be dominant, and their defense is also underrated. The Colts might have an ok defense, but they don't have enough good DBs to cover all of the Saints weapons. I also think that the Saints want it a lot more than the Colts.
|
|
|
Post by Whitetail Driven on Jan 26, 2010 16:39:32 GMT -5
Too many offensive weapons and an extremely underrated defense. were you talking about the Siants or Colts. If one of those teams has too many offensive weapons, it is the Saints. They have at least 4 recievers who are major threats, their running game can be dominant, and their defense is also underrated. The Colts might have an ok defense, but they don't have enough good DBs to cover all of the Saints weapons. I also think that the Saints want it a lot more than the Colts. The vikings corners for the most part shut down the saints big play guys and if the vikings can do that then so can the colts. GO COLTS!!
|
|
|
Post by hunterguy28 on Jan 26, 2010 20:15:49 GMT -5
GO COLTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by strippitman on Jan 27, 2010 8:21:44 GMT -5
Too many offensive weapons and an extremely underrated defense. I was speaking of the Colts. You're right, the Saints do have many weapons on offense, but good defenses have found ways to minimize them at times. If the Saints get rolling, things could get ugly for the Colts real fast. What I see happening though, is the colts will start off kind of slow and then Manning will discover a weakness in the saints D and then late in the 2nd qtr or early 3rd qtr he'll begin to dissect them. He does this dang near every game. The saints need to get a big lead early. I don't see them being able to come from behind, lalte in the game, to beat the Colts.
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Jan 27, 2010 17:57:47 GMT -5
THe thing with the Saints is that they can put up huge numbers fast and they have the running game to dominate time of possession after that. you are right though, a come from behind victory is very unlikely for the saints. should actually be a great game to watch.
|
|
|
Post by B-rad on Jan 30, 2010 13:21:42 GMT -5
I thought the colts and vikes woud be the superbowl teams this year. oh well, Go colts!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Whitetail Driven on Jan 30, 2010 16:28:23 GMT -5
I thought the colts and vikes woud be the superbowl teams this year. oh well, Go colts!!!!!!!!! Yeah i thought so too. The vikings got cheated by the refs and the people doing the booth reviews. Everyone knows the vikings should be in the super bowl.
|
|
|
Post by Brian on Jan 30, 2010 17:23:17 GMT -5
the vikings had plenty of chances in that game and they failed at all of them. was it the refs that turned the ball over 5 times? was it the refs who made farve throw that last interception? no. it was the vikings not getting things done.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2010 21:39:41 GMT -5
Colts all the way
|
|
|
Post by anthonydykes on Jan 30, 2010 21:51:32 GMT -5
colts...enough said
|
|
|
Post by Whitetail Driven on Jan 31, 2010 0:17:36 GMT -5
the vikings had plenty of chances in that game and they failed at all of them. was it the refs that turned the ball over 5 times? was it the refs who made farve throw that last interception? no. it was the vikings not getting things done. Jesus Christ stop defending the poor little saints like every one else. The saints didnt win that game the vikings lost it. The OT penatlys and booth reviews were HORRIABLE. The experts on NFL network even said the calls were wrong. Screw the saints. GO COLTS!
|
|
|
Post by B-rad on Jan 31, 2010 13:41:18 GMT -5
the vikings had plenty of chances in that game and they failed at all of them. was it the refs that turned the ball over 5 times? was it the refs who made farve throw that last interception? no. it was the vikings not getting things done. Jesus Christ stop defending the poor little saints like every one else. The saints didnt win that game the vikings lost it. The OT penatlys and booth reviews were HORRIABLE. The experts on NFL network even said the calls were wrong. Screw the saints. GO COLTS! I sorta agree.I really like Jared Allen for the vikes so i'll choose the vikes side. Refs don't lose the game, but they sure as heck can help. i do agree that the saints didn't win and that the vikings lost. i'd wonder who would win if there was a rematch though.
|
|
|
Post by Whitetail Driven on Jan 31, 2010 16:20:43 GMT -5
[/quote] I sorta agree.I really like Jared Allen for the vikes so i'll choose the vikes side. Refs don't lose the game, but they sure as heck can help. i do agree that the saints didn't win and that the vikings lost. i'd wonder who would win if there was a rematch though.[/quote] I guarentee you if there was a completly different officiating crew there the vikings would have won. If this game was at Minnesota the Vikings would have destroyed them, for the vikings to play and outgain the saints in the way that they did(vikings 500 yards, saints 250) is amazing. go colts
|
|